Pm Case Study free essay sample

At the end of the DVD, you will be asked to suggest alternative courses of action that could have been taken by Fred, the Chemical Engineer hired by Phaust to design a new plant to manufacture a new paint remover. Part A Chapter 1 Discussion Questions 1. What is Chuck’s primary motivation for hiring a Professional Engineer (P. E. )? 2. Dominique asks whether it is ethical to hire an engineer who has recently worked for a competitor, and Chuck replies that while employed as a contractor at Chemitoil, Fred was not required to sign a non-disclosure agreement. . Does Fred have any obligations of confidentiality to Chemitoil even if he has not signed a non-disclosure agreement? 3. Wally tells Fred that he has one rule: whether news is good or bad, Fred must always tell Wally first. What is the potential impact of Wally’s â€Å"One Rule†? 4. Chuck alludes to inflating the budget as a hedge against potential budget cuts. We will write a custom essay sample on Pm Case Study or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page What happens to a project when engineers are faced with budget cuts across all areas? Part B Chapter 2 Discussion Questions 1. Chuck’s brother-in-law is the US representative for Lutz and Lutz. What ethical questions does the procurement process raise when the in-law of a corporate officer works for the supplier? How does this situation look from the viewpoint of other potential suppliers? 2. While touring the SuisseChem plant, should Jake, Fred and Peter wear additional protective gear? 3. Is it proper for Fred to share his concerns with his wife, Maria, especialy sincer her employer is and environmental regulatory agency? Part C Chapter 3 Discussion Questions 1. Did Fred act responsibly in both a) lining the evaporation ponds and b) specifying cheaper controls? . While talking with Peter, Fred is inspired to make the couplings a maintenance issue. Is this appropriate? 3. Although the chemical process was supposed to be automated, Fred allowed Manuel to volunteer to control the process manually. Is this reasonable? 4. How should a company, such as Phaust, encourage honorable behavior and minimize ethical problems in the future? Part D Alternative Courses of Action Identify one of Fred’s major decisions or actions. Reflect on the decision he made and/or the action he took. For this action/decision, suggest an alternative course of action Fred could have taken. Imagine what the possible consequence of this alternative action would be. Evaluate this alternative according to the basic ethical values presented in the mini-lecture on ethics (Honesty, Fairness, Civility, Respect, Kindness). Your alternatives could also be evaluated by the following tests (Harm test, Reversibility test, Colleague test, Legality test, Publicity test, Common Practice test, Wise relative test). Summarize your alternative and its consequences